WebDevVote - MVC Routes and Magic Strings == “No Good”
1votes
voted
RMuth RMuth 6 months, 1 day ago
isi-net.com — I live and breath with ASP.NET MVC, but from the very beginning I’ve been very uncomfortable with the magic string nature of routes, controllers, and actions. I long ago stopped using the various “action” extensions because they are way too prone to fat finger screw ups and moved nearly 100% to using route extensions and putting my routes names into constants so as not to have any chance of fat finger issues, but recently, after reviewing the source code for MVC2, specifically the “LabelFor” extension, I realized there was even another way to limit fat finger screw ups via routing extensions and lambdas. original link
MVC Routes and Magic Strings == “No Good”
Tags: , | add tag

new Add a live vote counter to your blog >> liveImage

You can even customize the image by choosing your own colors, and then clicking the button below to update the preview and the html code:

  • "Vote it" text
  • "Vote it" Background
  • Vote count text
  • Vote count background
  • Border

Simply copy and paste this HTML into your blog post.

Users who voted this story

Comments

No comments so far!



information Thank you for your visit. Please create an account to share and vote!

Login or Sign up to add your comment.
  • Web Dev Vote's Facebook Profile
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • RSS



Technorati Profile